Buying Report · £14.99
Tools

MOT fail · manual section 7.1.1

Seat belt prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced

What this MOT fail means, how often testers record it and what the usual repair costs. From 130,233,413 DVSA MOT tests taken 2022 to 2025.

MOT data updated

As a fail, per 100 MOTs (n=130,233,413)0.18
Most often at25 years
Times recorded240,070

Times recorded adds every DVSA code with this wording, so a test can record it more than once, for example on two wheels under separate codes.

What it means

This is a major defect: the car fails its MOT. A major defect may affect the car’s safety, put other road users at risk or harm the environment. The car fails its MOT and the defect must be repaired.

Before it reaches this point, testers often record it as an advisory: Seat belt prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive.

Seat belts are checked for condition, security and operation, and the airbag and seat belt warning lamps are checked too.

The MOT inspection manual describes the defect (section 7.1.1) as:

The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired

Read this section of the MOT inspection manual on GOV.UK

The DVSA codes counted on this page: the manual item and the defect text as DVSA records them. The heading above joins the two, as a certificate does; the tester also adds the position, such as nearside front.
ResultManual itemDVSA defect textRecords
Fail MajorPrescribed areasprescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced (7.1.1)240,070

Got an MOT advisory or defect on a certificate? Paste it into the MOT advisory checker to see what it means.

How common it is by age

Testers record it most at 25 years: 1.77 per 100 MOTs (n=313,355 tests at that age).

Per 100 MOT tests of cars at each age, all makes. We show no figure below 20 tests.
AgeFail per 100Tests (n)
3 years08,016,463
4 years08,699,937
5 years0.0019,425,360
6 years0.00110,382,720
7 years0.00210,537,318
8 years0.00410,440,457
9 years0.0099,949,012
10 years0.0219,049,507
11 years0.0468,087,514
12 years0.0947,303,151
13 years0.166,612,160
14 years0.296,054,526
15 years0.425,591,675
16 years0.574,858,625
17 years0.724,040,458
18 years0.833,261,622
19 years0.922,479,858
20 years1.031,845,952
21 years1.141,321,417
22 years1.27913,980
23 years1.45619,531
24 years1.62428,815
25 years1.77313,355

Models that get it most

Each model generation is compared with cars of the same ages and fuel, so older and diesel models are not penalised for their age or fuel. Generations are never pooled.

Model generations with the highest rate as a fail, against cars of the same ages and fuel. A model’s figure counts this defect only at ages where it is among that model’s 25 most recorded items, and as zero elsewhere, so it is a floor. Tests (n) are all the generation’s MOT tests at ages with at least 1,000 tests each; at least 5,000 in total.
ModelPer 100 MOTs, at leastSame ages and fuelTimes as oftenTests (n)Ages
Citroen XsaraCitroen Xsara corrosion welding repair6.270.768.2125,73412 to 24
Chevrolet Lacetti2.680.357.78,13613 to 17
Ford Transit ConnectFord Transit Connect corrosion welding repair1.920.257.5676,6113 to 22
Ford KaFord Ka corrosion welding repair0.870.146.1743,1903 to 23
London Taxis International TX4London Taxis International TX4 corrosion welding repair0.690.125.953,5395 to 16
Chevrolet Kalos2.750.505.59,35415 to 18
Suzuki JimnySuzuki Jimny corrosion welding repair2.450.485.098,3083 to 25
Chevrolet Matiz1.910.385.044,17212 to 19
Citroen NemoCitroen Nemo corrosion welding repair0.760.174.557,5366 to 16
Daihatsu Terios2.160.494.314,63114 to 19
Ford Pumafirst used before 20195.491.314.18,30921 to 25
Ford TransitFord Transit corrosion welding repair0.850.214.01,227,9543 to 25
Jaguar X-TypeJaguar X-Type corrosion welding repair3.090.783.9111,25413 to 23
Citroen C22.000.553.649,93213 to 21
Kia Sedona2.020.633.121,14912 to 19
Ford Escort4.651.612.86,42822 to 25
Mazda MX-5Mazda MX-5 corrosion welding repair1.290.452.8348,2583 to 25
Suzuki Grand VitaraSuzuki Grand Vitara corrosion welding repair1.630.572.889,8239 to 23
Mazda Bongo1.970.702.835,0666 to 25
Honda FR-V1.640.592.729,99513 to 19
Read this with care. A fail rate is not a measure of build quality. How far cars are driven, how they are used and how well owners maintain them all change it, and wear items such as tyres and brake pads are common fails. Compare a model only with cars of the same age. Methodology and limits.

Repair and cost

The usual repair is corrosion welding repair.

No public source records the price of this whole job, and the time it takes varies from car to car, so we do not publish a single figure. Garages charge by the hour, so ask for a quote that lists labour time and parts. The rates below are what UK garages charge per hour.

Local garage labour, per hour (65 shops)£78
Local garage, middle half£70 to £96
Main dealer labour, per hour (62 shops)£156
Main dealer, middle half£144 to £174

Median hourly rate charged for car repairs, from 1,058 local garage and 953 main dealer price quotes collected by the ONS, September 2025 to August 2026. The same shops are priced each month, so the number of shops is the real sample.

Corrosion welding repair: cost and the models that need it more often

Related MOT defects

Buying a used car?

These figures describe all cars, not any one car. Found one you might buy? See what the VetTheCar Buying Report would tell you.

Source

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data, class 4 normal MOT tests, 2022 to 2025, and the MOT inspection manual published on GOV.UK. Prices: ONS consumer price inflation price quotes, September 2025 to August 2026, UK.

MOT data updated . Prices updated .

Not affiliated with or endorsed by DVSA or the Office for National Statistics. How we calculate these figures · Data sources