Buying Report · £14.99
Tools

Common problems by part

Suzuki Celerio seat belts and airbags problems

DVSA MOT tests 2022–2025 · 25,629 MOT tests · Updated

At 7 years, 0.4 in 100 MOT tests of the Suzuki Celerio failed on seat belts and airbags, against 0.4 for all class 4 vehicles the same age (all test years; 25,629 MOT tests) [1].

Buying Report £14.99 incl. VAT · one car · no subscription · Not a mechanical inspection.

  • Against all class 4 vehicles the same age: about average for all class 4 vehicles the same age (all test years), 109 MOT tests with a fail
  • By age: seen at 8 ages from 3 to 10 years, 110,627 MOT tests
  • Most common fail: Seat belt condition: buckle not functioning as intended, 0.3 per 100 MOT tests

Figures are for the model as a whole, not for one car.

What the MOT tests show

What we know

0.4 fails per 100 MOT tests at 7 years, against 0.4 for all class 4 vehicles tested at 7 (all test years). That is about average.

Why it matters

A seat belts and airbags fail stops the car passing until it is fixed; the most common one is rated major by DVSA.

What to check

Pull every seat belt out fully and let it retract, check each buckle latches and releases, and make sure the airbag light goes out after start-up.

Suzuki Celerio seat belts and airbags fails by age

Suzuki Celerio seat belts and airbags fails per 100 MOT tests by ageSolid line: the Suzuki Celerio. Dashed line: all cars the same age. The table below lists every value.00.20.40.63 years: 0.3 per 100 (all cars 0.3), 2,128 MOT tests34 years: 0.4 per 100 (all cars 0.3), 6,256 MOT tests45 years: 0.4 per 100 (all cars 0.3), 12,602 MOT tests56 years: 0.4 per 100 (all cars 0.4), 20,486 MOT tests67 years: 0.4 per 100 (all cars 0.4), 25,629 MOT tests78 years: 0.5 per 100 (all cars 0.5), 21,350 MOT tests89 years: 0.6 per 100 (all cars 0.6), 15,022 MOT tests910 years: 0.5 per 100 (all cars 0.7), 7,154 MOT tests10
Fails per 100 MOT tests by age, all first-use years pooled. Suzuki Celerio All class 4 vehicles the same age
AgeMOT testsFails per 100All class 4 vehicles the same age
32,1280.30.3
46,2560.40.3
512,6020.40.3
620,4860.40.4
725,6290.40.4
821,3500.50.5
915,0220.60.6
107,1540.50.7

All first-use years of the Suzuki Celerio pooled at each age, against all class 4 vehicles at that age over all 2022–2025 test years.

What fails in the seat belts and airbags at 7 years

Fails

Buying a Suzuki Celerio? Check that exact car before the viewing.

Buying Report £14.99 incl. VAT · one car · no subscription · Not a mechanical inspection.

  • Model risks for this year and fuel
  • What similar cars did at their next MOT
  • Repairs ahead
  • Viewing checklist

See a sample report

How to check on a test drive

Pull every seat belt out fully and let it retract, check each buckle latches and releases, and make sure the airbag light goes out after start-up.

Check one Suzuki Celerio, not the average

The figures here describe Suzuki Celerio cars as a group. These free tools answer for one car. Each line says what the tool reads.

Other Suzuki Celerio problems

Seat belts and airbags on rival models

Questions people ask

Does the Suzuki Celerio have more seat belts and airbags problems than other cars?

0.4 in 100 MOT tests at 7 years, against 0.4 for all class 4 vehicles the same age: about average by our test (all test years; 25,629 MOT tests).

How common are Suzuki Celerio seat belts and airbags problems?

0.4 in 100 MOT tests at 7 years failed on seat belts and airbags, against 0.4 for all class 4 vehicles the same age (all test years; 25,629 MOT tests).

What is the most common Suzuki Celerio seat belts and airbags fail?

0.3 in 100 MOT tests at 7 years: Seat belt condition: buckle not functioning as intended (76 MOT tests with it).

Sources

  1. Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency, Anonymised MOT tests and results, 2022 to 2025. DVSA MOT data, Open Government Licence v3.0, 110,627 MOT tests. Accessed 7 Oct 2026.

Parts: against all class 4 vehicles at the same age, all 2022–2025 test years pooled, not adjusted for mileage. Breakdowns and non-MOT faults are not in this data. How we compare